Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables
Date: 2010-10-28 14:15:24
Message-ID: 11969.1288275324@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am checking PLpgSQL ToDo topics, and I am not sure if this topic
> isn't done. And if not, then I would to get some detail.

I think that thread petered out because we didn't have consensus on
what the behavior ought to be. It goes back to whether there is
supposed to be a difference between NULL and ROW(NULL,NULL,NULL,...)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-28 14:23:05 Re: [PERFORM] Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-28 13:49:06 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...