| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql table inheritance |
| Date: | 2007-11-30 19:30:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1196451030.22428.394.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 21:42 +0800, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> --- post follows ---
> by Anonymous Coward on Wed Nov 28, '07 03:23 PM (#21509173)
>
> Speak for your database -- postgresql does.
>
> Postgresql's "table inheritance" is a flawed concept and has nothing to do
> with the *type system*. Relations contain tuples, and tuples contain
> attributes, which are a name plus a VALUE. Those values are chosen from TYPES
> (sets of possible values). Those types are the TYPE SYSTEM.
"Foundation for Future Database Systems: The Third Manifesto" by C.J.
Date and Hugh Darwen discusses this topic in Appendix E, and a related
topic in Appendix D.
They also propose, in detail with a lot of analysis, how they think that
type inheritance should work in the set of chapters on the Inheritance
Model, or "IM".
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-11-30 19:42:18 | Re: postgresql table inheritance |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-11-30 19:17:16 | Re: postgresql table inheritance |