Re: could not bind IPv4 address "127.0.0.1": Address already in use

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Siddharth Jain <siddhsql(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: could not bind IPv4 address "127.0.0.1": Address already in use
Date: 2023-03-08 04:28:50
Message-ID: 119637.1678249730@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Siddharth Jain <siddhsql(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But when I try to start the server I get this:

> 2023-03-07 17:16:43.228 PST [25925] LOG: could not bind IPv6 address
> "::1": Address already in use
> 2023-03-07 17:16:43.228 PST [25925] HINT: Is another postmaster already
> running on port 5432? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.
> 2023-03-07 17:16:43.228 PST [25925] LOG: could not bind IPv4 address
> "127.0.0.1": Address already in use
> 2023-03-07 17:16:43.228 PST [25925] HINT: Is another postmaster already
> running on port 5432? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.

That's pretty clear I think: the ports are already bound.

> I ran:
> netstat -ln -p tcp | grep 5432
> and there is no output.

This is the wrong incantation for this purpose. Try

netstat -an -p tcp | grep 5432

I expect you'll see a couple of ports in LISTEN state. Unfortunately,
netstat is not much help at locating the processes listening to such
ports. This might be more help:

lsof -n | grep 5432

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-03-08 04:49:15 Re: Behavior of PL/pgSQL function following drop and re-create of a table that it uses
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-03-08 04:26:38 Fwd: Behavior of PL/pgSQL function following drop and re-create of a table that it uses