From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
Date: | 2007-11-26 16:58:57 |
Message-ID: | 1196096337.4246.778.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 09:55 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > But I think there must be an action that we can take for 8.3 and that
> > much runtime should not be given away easily. ISTM that we can win back
> > the losses Guillaume has identified, plus gain a little more even.
>
> Perhaps some sanity could be restored to this discussion by pointing out
> that the 2007-01-01 code *also* clocks in at 37% spent in
> oper_select_candidate. IOW it's been like this for a very long time.
> I'm not interested in destabilizing 8.3 with panicky last-minute patches.
I think this is worth taking action on, IMHO.
I've written up my suggestion as a 5 line patch, with measured
performance improvement of about 40% for the varchar case.
It isn't a great long term fix, but I don't want to delay 8.3 either
with the full fix.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-26 17:00:46 | Re: Replacement Selection |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-26 16:55:51 | Re: Locating sharedir in PostgreSQL on Windows |