From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Petru Ghita <petrutz(at)venaver(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Date comparison, user defined operators and magic |
Date: | 2010-02-27 03:32:03 |
Message-ID: | 11952.1267241523@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Petru Ghita <petrutz(at)venaver(dot)info> writes:
> Hello everybody, I was missing a comparison operator for DATE so I
> wrote one after a really fast look into the documentation.
Huh?
regression=# \do <
List of operators
Schema | Name | Left arg type | Right arg type | Result type | Description
------------+------+-----------------------------+-----------------------------+-------------+---------------------
...
pg_catalog | < | date | date | boolean | less-than
...
> So I started to wonder how is this possible because after doing the
> first comparison using the < operator I really wasn't expecting any of
> the other operators to work at all. But they did!
They were all there before. I doubt it was using yours even in the <
case, because pg_catalog is normally at the front of the search path.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Gould | 2010-02-27 17:14:39 | Issue with insert |
Previous Message | Petru Ghita | 2010-02-27 03:08:31 | Date comparison, user defined operators and magic |