Mentioning Slony in docs

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Mentioning Slony in docs
Date: 2007-11-08 08:10:40
Message-ID: 1194509440.4251.180.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs

IMHO it would be appropriate to provide better links to Slony from
within the Postgres docs.

The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we own the code
and it is of course BSD licenced.

Now that this has been highlighted to me, I can't see a reason for the
previous balanced approach.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-11-08 09:10:14 Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2007-11-07 22:20:37 PostgreSQL Advocates Press On

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-11-08 09:10:14 Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-05 17:35:50 Re: [HACKERS] Asynchronous commit documentation gap