Re: Select for update with outer join broken?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Select for update with outer join broken?
Date: 2006-10-02 16:35:50
Message-ID: 11941.1159806950@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Oh, no, what should happen is that the outer join portion of the query doesn't
> get locked, rather than a fatal exception. That behavior is expected by the
> J2EE certification, so it's at least somewhat industry-standard.

Really? Please cite chapter and verse. And why should it be that the
unmatched outer-side rows don't get locked (which is what I think you
just said)?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-10-02 17:02:55 Re: Update using sub-select table in schema
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-10-02 16:25:45 Re: Select for update with outer join broken?