From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |
Date: | 2007-10-11 18:41:29 |
Message-ID: | 1192128089.19081.47.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 13:45 -0400, Derek Rodner wrote:
> Sean Hull over at Database Journal has posted Part 2 of his database
> comparison.
>
>
>
> Here are links to both parts:
>
> Part 1 -
> http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3692566
>
> Part 2 -
> http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3703376
>
>
One thing that stood out to me was:
"Auditing
Oracle allows you to enable auditing to a table, or a file via the audit
trail facility. Once enabled, you can audit insert, update, or delete
on a specific table, for instance, or logins, or even all access by a
particular user. There are quite a few options, and it's easy to
enable.
Postgresql too has this functionality and it seems to be as flexible and
configurable as Oracle's.
..."
What functionality is he referring to? There are some projects on
pgfoundry, but I don't think of the auditing capabilities of postgresql
as either complete or easy.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Voelker | 2007-10-11 18:49:16 | Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-10-11 18:21:07 | Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2 |