| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 17:47:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1192038435.4233.322.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 12:08 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The results have nothing to do with whether the process was followed.
> We do not ignore process violations just because the outcome was OK.
>
> And Jan did not come even close to following procedure. He just asked
> core if they would object to such an addition post-feature freeze. He
> did not show code to core so there is no sense the core approved the
> patch. And Jan did not show the patch to hackers or discuss the patch
> application.
>
> I do not want to keep bashing Jan but Simon's statements require me to
> set the record straight.
Record straight; please consider my comments withdrawn.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-10-10 18:04:19 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 17:29:45 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 17:58:41 | Re: Timezone database changes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-10 17:29:45 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |