| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 06:08:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1191996482.4233.117.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 18:35 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I think this project has got too big for us to make things up as we go
> along. We need to follow processes that are well understood and
> transparent.
Well said, I very much agree.
Mostly we do, but since we've just spent more than 6 months between
Feature Freeze and Beta. There were no well understood or transparent
processes during that period, so nobody is on solid ground trying to
enforce a small number of rules with a single individual. Especially
when discussing what might be argued was a major item in 8.3
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2007-10-10 06:09:04 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-10-10 05:59:47 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2007-10-10 06:09:04 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-10-10 06:05:42 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |