Re: Decade indication

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Decade indication
Date: 2020-01-02 13:52:17
Message-ID: 11919.1577973137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 11:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I see Randall Munroe has weighed in on this topic:
>> https://xkcd.com/2249/

> And the conclusion is ... the whole discussion is stupid?

Well, it's not terribly useful anyway. Arguments founded on an
assumption that there's anything rational or consistent about
human calendars tend to run into problems with that assumption.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2020-01-02 13:55:39 infinite histogram bounds and nan (Re: comment regarding double timestamps; and, infinite timestamps and NaN)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-01-02 13:47:28 Re: remove support for old Python versions