From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types |
Date: | 2007-10-06 17:48:47 |
Message-ID: | 1191692927.4223.470.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 10:15 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:
> > Yeh, it does, but you're forgetting that my original complaint was that
> > you couldn't use it in an ANY clause, which 4.2 does not exclude.
> > Bearing in mind you can use a scalar subquery in lots of places, I
> > thought it worth reporting.
>
> Well, but I'd argue that we're now talking about separate issues.
It's simpler than that. I asked a question because the manual isn't
specific on my original point. I'll do a doc patch to make sure nobody
makes the same mistake I did and we record all the good points people
have made.
> > Section 9.20.3 mentions ANY (array expression). The term "array
> > expression" is not defined nor is there a link to where it is defined,
> > nor is the term indexed.
>
> I'm not sure why we're using a separate term for that.
The term "array expression" is used in the manual, but not defined.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-06 17:53:31 | Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-10-06 17:43:13 | Re: Encoding and i18n |