Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Polymorphic arguments and composite types
Date: 2007-10-06 17:48:47
Message-ID: 1191692927.4223.470.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 10:15 -0700, Stephan Szabo wrote:

> > Yeh, it does, but you're forgetting that my original complaint was that
> > you couldn't use it in an ANY clause, which 4.2 does not exclude.
> > Bearing in mind you can use a scalar subquery in lots of places, I
> > thought it worth reporting.
>
> Well, but I'd argue that we're now talking about separate issues.

It's simpler than that. I asked a question because the manual isn't
specific on my original point. I'll do a doc patch to make sure nobody
makes the same mistake I did and we record all the good points people
have made.

> > Section 9.20.3 mentions ANY (array expression). The term "array
> > expression" is not defined nor is there a link to where it is defined,
> > nor is the term indexed.
>
> I'm not sure why we're using a separate term for that.

The term "array expression" is used in the manual, but not defined.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-06 17:53:31 Windows and locales and UTF-8 (oh my)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-06 17:43:13 Re: Encoding and i18n