| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mija Lee <mija(at)scharp(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
| Date: | 2007-10-01 18:54:48 |
| Message-ID: | 1191264888.4260.69.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice |
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 19:36 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I *do* think it's an accurate statement that if you're going to use
> > Postgres, or any other OLTP database, on NFS you'd better have access to
> > a NAS expert. But to say that it's a bad idea even if you have expert
> > help is probably going to far.
>
> I can see many papers on database performance on NFS, but I don't see
> any discussion of potential reliability concerns. If anybody sits near
> an NAS expert, it would be great to have that discussion.
http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-01 23:25:16 | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-10-01 18:36:54 | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-10-01 19:20:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Text <-> C string |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-10-01 18:36:54 | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wright, George | 2007-10-01 21:37:57 | Re: DST question |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-10-01 18:36:54 | Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea |