| From: | Ow Mun Heng <Ow(dot)Mun(dot)Heng(at)wdc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns? |
| Date: | 2007-09-07 03:41:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1189136489.17218.44.camel@neuromancer.home.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:19 -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > => select code, round(avg(case when subset = '0' then value else null
> > end),0) as v0,
> > round(avg(case when subset = '1' then value else null end),0) as v1,
> > round(avg(case when subset = '2' then value else null end),0) as v2,
> > round(avg(case when subset = '3' then value else null end),0) as v3,
> > round(avg(case when subset = '4' then value else null end),0) as v4
> > from foo
> > group by code;
> > code | v0 | v1 | v2 | v3 | v4
> > ------+----+----+----+----+----
> > A | 98 | 20 | 98 | 98 | 98
>
> An alternative way to get the output below, would be to feed your
> aggregate query above to the crosstab() function in contrib/tablefunc.
I just looked at it and seems like the
...
row_name and value must be of type text
...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-07 03:54:31 | Re: an other provokative question?? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2007-09-07 03:19:13 | Re: Column as arrays.. more efficient than columns? |