From: | Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL to RAW devices ? |
Date: | 2007-09-01 00:18:13 |
Message-ID: | 1188605893.6082.51.camel@localhost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
But would it be a problem to have only 1 active segment at all times ?
My inspiration pretty much comes from Oracle, where redo logs are
pre-configured and can be switched by a command issued to the instance.
> Just because you'd like that to be true doesn't make it true. We have
> to manage a variable number of active segments; track whether a given
> segment is waiting for future use, active, waiting to be archived, etc;
> manage status signaling to the archiver process; and so on. Now I'll
> freely admit that using a filesystem is only one of the ways that those
> problems could be attacked, but that's how they've been attacked in
> Postgres. If you want to not have that functionality present then
> you'd need to rewrite all that code and provide some other
> infrastructure for it to use.
>
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-09-01 00:23:39 | Re: WAL to RAW devices ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-01 00:08:10 | Re: WAL to RAW devices ? |