Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3
Date: 2012-10-07 15:25:50
Message-ID: 11878.1349623550@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chesnok(dot)com> writes:
> This also represents my inaugural use of pg_bsd_indent. I ran it on
> pl_check.c - which made things mostly better. Happy to try and fix it
> up more if someone can explain to me what (if anything) I did
> incorrectly when using it.

It looks like you didn't give it a typedef list? Fetch the file from
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/typedefs.pl
and pass it with --typedefs=filename. If you're dealing with something
that adds new typedef names, you can add them to the list file manually.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-10-07 15:29:49 Re: Regarding identifying a foreign scan
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-10-07 07:54:56 Re: 64-bit API for large object