From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: log_autovacuum |
Date: | 2007-08-03 19:59:15 |
Message-ID: | 1186171155.4136.3.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> >> Could I suggest renaming log_autovacuum to log_autovacuum_min_duration?
>
> > Sure, whatever makes the most sense. In fact min_duration would be more
> > consistent.
>
> I'm not sure I believe Greg's argument about needing more autovac
> logging parameters, but since this one acts just like
> log_min_duration_statement, I concur with renaming it.
log_min_duration_autovacuum
makes the most sense in comparison, IMHO.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-03 20:07:56 | Re: "smart" shutdown is broken in HEAD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-03 18:35:06 | Re: "smart" shutdown is broken in HEAD |