| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look? |
| Date: | 2007-07-23 15:47:43 |
| Message-ID: | 1185205663.4284.249.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I looked at this last May and my notes say "ExecutorState". I guess that
> > was wrong, but my analysis showed there was a single malloc of 8228
> > bytes happening once per query during my tests.
>
> Well, if you can track down where it's coming from, we could certainly
> hack the containing context's parameters. But EState's not it.
Well, I discover there is an allocation of 8232 (inflation...) made once
per statement by a memory context called... ExecutorState. Still not
sure exactly which allocation this is, but its definitely once per
statement on pgbench, which should narrow it down. Plan, query etc?
I don't see a way to hack the allocation, since the max chunk size is
8K.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-23 16:35:28 | Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-23 14:54:58 | Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look? |