From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jonathan Marks <jonathanaverymarks(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Rapid disk usage spikes when updating large tables with GIN indexes |
Date: | 2018-05-16 20:28:05 |
Message-ID: | 11849.1526502485@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jonathan Marks <jonathanaverymarks(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> We turned on log_temp_files and since the last stats reset (about a week ago) we’re seeing 0 temp files altogether (grabbing that info from pg_stat_database).
Hm.
> Another thread we found suggested pg_subtrans — this seems less likely because we’ve been able to replicate this across many different types of connections etc. but thought it might be a potential source.
We're running out of other ideas, so maybe, but it's kind of hard to
credit large numbers of gigabytes going into pg_subtrans et al.
Still, you could easily adapt your WAL-size query to track the sizes
of other DB subdirectories and see if anything springs out. Since
I'm really feeling a bit baffled at this point, I'd suggest watching
all of them:
pg_commit_ts/
pg_dynshmem/
pg_logical/mappings/
pg_logical/snapshots/
pg_multixact/members/
pg_multixact/offsets/
pg_logical/
pg_multixact/
pg_notify/
pg_replslot/
pg_serial/
pg_snapshots/
pg_stat/
pg_stat_tmp/
pg_subtrans/
pg_tblspc/
pg_twophase/
pg_wal/
pg_xact/
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2018-05-16 20:31:34 | Re: Rapid disk usage spikes when updating large tables with GIN indexes |
Previous Message | Jonathan Marks | 2018-05-16 20:10:26 | Re: Rapid disk usage spikes when updating large tables with GIN indexes |