Re: HOT latest patch - version 8

From: <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: HOT latest patch - version 8
Date: 2007-07-16 20:24:33
Message-ID: 1184617473.19200.109.camel@sakai.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

> I'm looking for ways to make the patch simpler and less invasive.

Any objections to changing the name of "RedirectDead"? A RedirectDead
ItemId is not really redirected, it's just a stub representing a dead
tuple (the space for that tuple has been reused but an index entry may
still point to the ItemId).

How about "stub" or "tombstone"?

-- Korry

--
Korry Douglas korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-07-17 02:22:39 docfix - DELETE doesn't affect auto-analyze
Previous Message Neil Conway 2007-07-16 17:38:30 Re: bogus unixware compiler warnings