Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Date: 2007-07-13 14:40:32
Message-ID: 1184337632.4512.159.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 10:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > is misleading and dishonest, as is
> > > preventing even the community from doing benchmarks. Please stop.
> >
> > My understanding is that the product requires a licence key to operate
> > and that this is for revenue protection, not to explicitly prevent
> > benchmarks. My understanding is that Sales is happy to let any serious
> > buyer test the performance of the product.
>
> The point I think people are making is that while you can do benchmarks,
> you can't publish your results (which is similar to other commercial
> database license restrictions).

I was not previously aware of such a restriction.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-07-13 14:54:34 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-13 14:19:59 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL related pressrelease