From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
Date: | 2004-09-23 20:54:28 |
Message-ID: | 11834.1095972868@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> writes:
> The JDBC driver currently sends Describe/Execute and expects exactly one
> of RowDescription/NoData followed by zero or more DataRows followed by
> one of CommandComplete/EmptyQueryResponse/PortalSuspended. This seems
> wrong if there could be multiple resultsets from a single Execute.
This is okay if you know the query was a SELECT, since we don't allow
ON SELECT rules that aren't view-like (ie, DO INSTEAD SELECT something-else).
Non-SELECT queries can return multiple result sets, though, as I
illustrated. It's probably reasonable for the driver to throw these
away if it's not looking for a resultset at all. Or you could follow
PQexec's lead and discard all but the last.
> How can clients distinguish multiple resultsets if they're using the
> extended query protocol?
You'll get multiple repetitions of RowDescription/DataRows.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-09-23 21:03:03 | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-09-23 20:40:43 | Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1 |