| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql: add volatility to \df+ |
| Date: | 2007-06-27 07:23:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1182928991.8960.6.camel@goldbach |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Wed, 2007-27-06 at 00:16 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> +1 as well but I'm wondering whether the output is too wide.
Well, the output of \df+ is already likely to be wider than 72
characters, so I'm not sure the patch would really make the situation
materially worse ("\df+ nextval" is 118 characters wide without the
patch, for example). You could also argue that if the user specifies
"+", presumably they are less worried about a concise output format.
> Is it possible to find some shorter string to convey the same meaning?
Nothing obvious comes to mind, but I'm not opposed in principle. Any
suggestions?
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-06-27 09:06:06 | HOT latest patch - version 8 |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-06-27 07:22:22 | Re: Cancel autovacuum conflicting with DROP TABLE |