| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics |
| Date: | 2007-06-22 13:51:33 |
| Message-ID: | 1182520293.9276.287.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 14:29 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> untrustworthy disk hardware, for instance. I'd much rather use names
> >> derived from "deferred commit" or "delayed commit" or some such.
> >
> > Honestly, I prefer these names as well as it seems directly related versus
> > transaction guarantee which sounds to be more like us saying, if we turn it off
> > our transactions are bogus.
That was the intention..., but name change accepted.
> Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"
Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-06-22 13:54:36 | Re: tsearch in core patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-06-22 13:36:23 | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |