Re: to partition or not to partition that is the question

From: Timasmith <timasmith(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: to partition or not to partition that is the question
Date: 2007-06-21 15:08:06
Message-ID: 1182438486.844450.100440@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 19, 2:23 pm, j(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)agliodbs(dot)com (Josh Berkus) wrote:
> Tim,
>
> > I have two types of tables, for sake of argument lets call it these:
>
> > 1) product 10,000,000 rows
> > 2) product_activity 1,000,000,000 rows
>
> pgsql-performance is the correct list for your question. Please re-post it
> there. -hackers is for PostgreSQL development.
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Well no reply in pgsql-performance so it was pointless re-post, I
posted here because there is more activity in this forum.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-06-21 15:34:42 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-06-21 15:03:17 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent