Re: There can be only one! How to avoid the "highlander-problem".

From: Erwin Brandstetter <brsaweda(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: There can be only one! How to avoid the "highlander-problem".
Date: 2007-06-05 13:36:41
Message-ID: 1181050601.303066.87390@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Jun 5, 8:35 am, s(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)enterprisedb(dot)com (Gregory Stark) wrote:
> "Erwin Brandstetter" <brsaw(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I postulate further that a king only be king of his own people (rules out
> > multiple kingships, too).
>
> That's not how it's worked in the past :)

Yeah i know. :) That's why I had to postulate this one explicitly.

> If you have a nation table wouldn't you just have a king_id column in that
> table which is a foreign key reference to man_id?

Have a look at my model 3.) above ..

Regards
Erwin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erwin Brandstetter 2007-06-05 13:47:30 Re: There can be only one! How to avoid the "highlander-problem".
Previous Message Bhavana.Rakesh 2007-06-05 13:35:46 Re: jdbc pg_hba.conf error