From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Partitioning (was Re: Slightly OT.) |
Date: | 2007-06-04 20:52:10 |
Message-ID: | 1180990330.7660.9.camel@dogma.v10.wvs |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/01/07 19:29, Jeff Davis wrote:
> [snip]
> > You shouldn't use a volatile function in a check constraint. Use a
> > trigger instead, but even that is unlikely to work for enforcing
> > constraints correctly.
> >
> > In general, for partitioning, you have to make some sacrifices. It's
> > very challenging (and/or expensive) to ensure uniqueness across
> > partitions.
>
> Are partitioned databases the same as federated databases?
>
I think that usually people refer to a table that is split to be
partitioned (whether across servers or within a single server). I think
federated databases are where various parts of the database are split
across servers, but tables may be intact.
That's my own understanding of the terminology.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-04 20:58:00 | Re: PITR Base Backup on an idle 8.1 server |
Previous Message | Mario Guenterberg | 2007-06-04 20:39:23 | Re: Inserting a path into Database |