From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Uhm, so, yeah, speaking of /. |
Date: | 2007-05-30 18:31:47 |
Message-ID: | 1180549907.26915.121.camel@dogma.v10.wvs |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:18 -0600, Scott Ribe wrote:
> > I thought it had to do with letting a form sit around too long and
> > then /. timing out the state.
> >
> > That's probably not good anyway: it should at least give you a real
> > error message. However, they might not consider that a bug.
>
> I didn't let the form sit around at all--didn't think to mention that
> before. It may well not be related to MySQL at all, the point is simply that
> although /. is well-known, gets a lot of hits, and works well enough for its
> intended purpose, it is buggy and is NOT an example of what would be
> acceptable reliability for most "mission critical" applications.
>
I was agreeing with you.
I think that's what the "invalid form key" error is supposed to mean,
but it probably happens for all kinds of other cases, too (which is bad
and causes confusion).
I agree that /. not a great example of stability or correctness.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | novnov | 2007-05-30 18:40:15 | Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored? |
Previous Message | Scott Ribe | 2007-05-30 18:18:26 | Re: Uhm, so, yeah, speaking of /. |