From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
Date: | 2016-09-30 19:15:29 |
Message-ID: | 117edb9c-1ddd-9305-8946-82c6ff63ac20@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 9/6/16 2:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> 0001-0003 look clear to me as well. 0006 - 0009 also seem OK. The rest
> really only make sense if we decided to make the switch to C++.
I have committed 0001, 0002, 0003, 0006, as well as 0012. Thomas Munro
had some interesting comments on 0007-0009 that are worth considering
further.
The rest of the patches will be kept around for future amusement.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | kbrannen | 2016-09-30 19:19:03 | Re: Multi tenancy : schema vs databases |
Previous Message | kbrannen | 2016-09-30 18:45:25 | Re: Graphical entity relation model |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-09-30 19:24:09 | Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2016-09-30 19:12:32 | Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE |