From: | valgog <valgog(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance |
Date: | 2007-05-22 10:35:29 |
Message-ID: | 1179830129.622698.240380@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On May 22, 12:14 pm, l(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)peufeu(dot)com (PFC) wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2007 10:23:03 +0200, valgog <val(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I found several post about INSERT/UPDATE performance in this group,
> > but actually it was not really what I am searching an answer for...
>
> > I have a simple reference table WORD_COUNTS that contains the count of
> > words that appear in a word array storage in another table.
>
> Mmm.
>
> If I were you, I would :
>
> - Create a procedure that flattens all the arrays and returns all the
> words :
>
> PROCEDURE flatten_arrays RETURNS SETOF TEXT
> FOR word_array IN SELECT word_array FROM your_table LOOP
> FOR i IN 1...array_upper( word_array ) LOOP
> RETURN NEXT tolower( word_array[ i ] )
>
> So, SELECT * FROM flatten_arrays() returns all the words in all the arrays.
> To get the counts quickly I'd do this :
>
> SELECT word, count(*) FROM flatten_arrays() AS word GROUP BY word
>
> You can then populate your counts table very easily and quickly, since
> it's just a seq scan and hash aggregate. One second for 10.000 rows would
> be slow.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
good idea indeed! will try this approach.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | valgog | 2007-05-22 10:38:06 | Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance |
Previous Message | PFC | 2007-05-22 10:14:48 | Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance |