| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "peter_e" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS |
| Date: | 2010-01-19 16:47:32 |
| Message-ID: | 11788.1263919652@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Oh, and what sort of delay do you feel would be "long enough to
> cover any cvs commit including potential network slowness during it
> etc."?
Why should the script make any assumptions about delay at all?
It seems to me that the problem comes from failing to check for
changed files, no more and no less. It would be much less of an
issue if a non-atomic CVS commit showed up as two separate GIT
commits with similar log messages.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2010-01-19 16:58:16 | Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-19 16:43:10 | Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions |