| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Date: | 2007-05-01 18:09:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1178042991.3606.184.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:43 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> The current patch-queue process is failing to scale with the project: every
> release it gets to be more work for you & Tom to integrate the patches. We
> need to think of new approaches to make the review process scale. As a
> pointed example, you're about to go on tour for 2 weeks and patch review will
> stall while you're gone. That's not sustainable.
This seems a reasonable observation on events.
I'll come up with ideas to help, if asked, but I'd like to follow a
proposal from Core on this issue.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 2007-05-01 18:10:53 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Preliminary GSSAPI Patches |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-05-01 17:58:23 | Re: Heap page diagnostic functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-01 20:10:07 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-05-01 17:55:43 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |