From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tf(at)o(dot)ptimized(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [DOCS] Incrementally Updated Backups: Docs Clarification |
Date: | 2007-04-25 14:42:33 |
Message-ID: | 1177512153.20637.116.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:48 -0500, Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
> "If we take a backup of the standby server's files while it is
> following logs shipped from the primary, we will be able to reload
> that data and restart the standby's recovery process from the last
> restart point. We no longer need to keep WAL files from before the
> restart point. If we need to recover, it will be faster to recover
> from the incrementally updated backup than from the original base
> backup."
>
>
> I'm specifically confused about the meaning of the following phrases:
>
>
> "backup of the standby server's files" - Which files?
the files that make up the database server:
- data directory
- all tablespace directories
> "reload that data" - What does this mean in postgres terms?
copy back from wherever you put them in the first place
"that data" referring to the "files that make up the db server"
> "last restart point" - What is this? Wouldn't it be able to restart
> from the last recovered file, which would presumably occur later than
> the last restart point?
No, we don't restart file-by-file.
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-PITR-RECOVERY
"If recovery finds a corruption in the WAL..." onwards explains the
restart mechanism. It's much like checkpointing, so we don't restart
from the last log file we restart from a point possibly many log files
in the past.
> Does this mean make a filesystem backup of the standby server's data
> directory while it's stopped, and then start it again with that data
> and the restricted set of WAL files needed to continue recovery?
No need to stop server. Where do you read you need to do that?
> I'd like to see the language here converted to words that have more
> meaning in the context of postgres. I'd be happy to attempt a revision
> of this section once I'm able to complete an incrementally updated
> backup successfully.
Feel free to provide updates that make it clearer.
> Here's how I envision it playing out in practice:
>
>
> 1. stop standby postgres server
> 2. [optional] preserve data directory, remove unnecessary WAL files
> 3. restart standby server
step 2 only.
Clearly not an optional step, since its a 1 stage process. :-)
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas F. O'Connell | 2007-04-25 20:26:19 | Re: [DOCS] Incrementally Updated Backups: Docs Clarification |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-04-25 02:07:10 | Re: row-level stats and last analyze time |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-04-25 14:46:48 | Re: Stored Procedure Speed |
Previous Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2007-04-25 14:42:30 | Re: Audit-trail engine: getting the application's layer user_id |