| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres: 100% CPU utilization |
| Date: | 2007-04-23 20:21:46 |
| Message-ID: | 1177359706.15085.8.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 15:00, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> > And do you have 32 or 64 Megs of memory in that machine?
> >
> > Cause honestly, that's the kinda hardware I was running 7.0.2 on,
> > so you
> > might as well get retro in your hardware department while you're at
> > it.
>
> I think you're being too conservative... I recall that those specs
> for me correspond to running Pg 6.5 as the latest release... talk
> about performance and corruption issues... :-) He's probably got at
> least a Pentium II.
Yeah, now that you mention it, I think I was able to come up with a
Pentium 100 with 64 Megs of RAM about the time 6.5 came out, on RedHat
5.1 then 5.2, and with a pair of 1.2 gig IDE drives under the hood.
Those were the days, huh?
I honestly kinda wondered if the original post came out of a time warp,
like some mail relay somewhere held onto it for 4 years or something.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2007-04-23 23:59:12 | Re: postgres: 100% CPU utilization |
| Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-04-23 20:00:31 | Re: postgres: 100% CPU utilization |