Re: postgresql 8.1.4 to 8.2.3

From: Sven Willenberger <sven(at)dmv(dot)com>
To: Anton Melser <melser(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alain Roger <raf(dot)news(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql 8.1.4 to 8.2.3
Date: 2007-04-17 20:32:25
Message-ID: 1176841945.5553.13.camel@lanshark.dmv.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 22:01 +0200, Anton Melser wrote:
> On 14/04/07, Alain Roger <raf(dot)news(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > After clicking on your link i got "invalid project" page :-(
> > and the whole page is empty...
>
> Ouch Alain...
> Try
> http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pg-migrator/
> :-)
> But ask a single postgres oldskool cat (which I am patently not!) and
> you will get exactly the same answer "Do you value your data?". This
> is for people who want to tinker, or who simply can't dump/reload.
> Until it gets included in postgres core of course!
>
>
> > > > RTFM :-). Between major versions (8.1 -> 8.2) you DO need to dump and
> > > > reload. So do that...
> > >
> > > Actually, this isn't strictly true:
> > http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pg-
> > > migrator/

So from the docs of pg-migrator:
"PostgreSQL version 8.2 changes the layout for values of type INET and
CIDR" - thus any tables with columns of those data types would have to
be dump/restored.

My questions would be a) are there any other data types that have had
changes made to their on-disk representation? and b) have there been any
changes made to the table infrastucture layout from 8.1.x to 8.2 (that
would cause pg-migrator not to work) ?

Sven

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-17 23:38:50 Re: rename constraints ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-17 18:51:46 Re: bug in schema export?