From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: scrollable cursor support without MOVE statement |
Date: | 2007-04-16 22:42:21 |
Message-ID: | 1176763341.3635.384.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 18:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm concerned that many PL/pgSQL routines will now run slower because
> > they may now be considered scrollable when they previously were not.
>
> There is no change in the default behavior.
Previously:
- PL/pgSQL cursors were non-scrollable
- DECLARE CURSOR cursors were not non-scrollable by default
The new docs say it is "query dependent", whereas previously the default
was non-scrollable. That sounds like a change in the default behaviour,
so I'm trying to dig a little deeper.
Are you saying that if I don't say anything at all then a cursor will be
non-scrollable?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-16 22:56:58 | Re: scrollable cursor support without MOVE statement |
Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-04-16 22:39:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |