Re: Auto Partitioning

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "NikhilS" <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning
Date: 2007-04-05 11:28:16
Message-ID: 1175772496.3623.301.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:35 +0530, NikhilS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I had raised this issue about rules/triggers back then and
> the
> > responses seemed to be evenly split as to which ones to
> use.
>
> Presumably your implementation already uses Triggers for
> INSERTs though,
> so why not use triggers for everything?
>
> No I am using rules for all the 3 cases.

So we are unable to load any of the tables using COPY.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-04-05 11:58:48 Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-04-05 11:15:50 Re: Load distributed checkpoint V3

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message NikhilS 2007-04-05 12:13:26 Re: Auto Partitioning
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-04-05 11:15:50 Re: Load distributed checkpoint V3