Re: Reference Type in PostgreSQL

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Elena <elena(dot)planas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reference Type in PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-03-20 02:10:47
Message-ID: 1174356647.23455.483.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 11:30 +0100, Elena wrote:
> Hello all, I'm new in PostgreSQL...
>
> I would want to know like PostgreSQL manages the type reference that
> defines the standard SQL:1999. I want to define the type of attribute
> like a reference at other type.
>

PostgreSQL doesn't allow references/pointers. OIDs are the closest thing
to a reference in PostgreSQL.

>From _An Introduction to Database Systems_ by C.J. Date, p. 872:
"The blunder [The Second Great Blunder] consists of mixing pointers and
relations."

So not everyone thinks that references/pointers in a relation value are
a good idea.

I don't know how the PostgreSQL developers feel about it, but I haven't
seen a lot of demand for this feature on these lists.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dhaval Shah 2007-03-20 07:30:06 Unable to start postgres in recovery mode.
Previous Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2007-03-20 01:58:42 Re: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset