Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans
Date: 2007-03-07 22:03:16
Message-ID: 1173304996.3641.15.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 11:09 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3.
> > However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has
> > decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
>
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE? That would be very
> handy all by itself.

I thought Greg already did submitted that?

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sorin Schwimmer 2007-03-07 23:30:12 query ... returned 4 columns
Previous Message Webb Sprague 2007-03-07 21:44:51 Re: Database slowness -- my design, hardware, or both?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2007-03-07 22:24:02 Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-03-07 21:59:26 Re: Grouped Index Tuples / Clustered Indexes