| From: | Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha <ezequias(dot)rocha(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deadlock on transaction |
| Date: | 2007-02-12 19:20:51 |
| Message-ID: | 1171308051.3565.18.camel@state.g2switchworks.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-sql |
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:08, Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha wrote:
> I mean really deadlock. Other transactions can't access the database
> until the main transaction is complete. A question:
>
> PostgreSQL doesn't permit multiple transactions concurrently ?
Again, that's not a deadlock. A deadlock would mean that the
transaction causing the lock never returned, because it wound up waiting
for another transaction that was in turn waiting on it. i.e.
begin transaction a
begin trasnaction b
a does something that waits on b
b does something that waits on a
neither transaction can complete.
What you have is a blocking transaction.
In postgresql, very few transactions tend to block other transactions.
Have you got a test case that demonstrates your problem with blocking?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 19:27:15 | Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction |
| Previous Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 19:20:30 | Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 19:27:15 | Re: [ADMIN] Deadlock on transaction |
| Previous Message | Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha | 2007-02-12 19:20:30 | Re: [SQL] Deadlock on transaction |