Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Date: 2007-02-09 03:03:49
Message-ID: 1170990229.22638.19.camel@silverbirch.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Packed doesn't seem to have quite the right connotation either --- it
> >> sounds like it means there are two separable fields in the CID value.
> >>
> >> Maybe "composite cid"?
>
> > At one point I was thinking "combo". but "composite" sounds good.

Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds.

That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-09 03:08:24 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-09 02:53:19 Re: [PATCHES] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-02-09 03:08:24 Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-09 02:53:19 Re: [PATCHES] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code