| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Martin, Sylvain R(dot) (LNG)" <Sylvain(dot)Martin(at)lexis-nexis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bug in index? |
| Date: | 2000-07-07 19:37:14 |
| Message-ID: | 11705.962998634@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I had your prior message on my "to look at" list; the behavior seems
pretty odd. Two questions:
1. Which version are you running, exactly?
2. Might 'peripherals & access' happen to be the largest (last in
sort order) keyword present in your table?
If #2 is true, then this might represent some sort of boundary-condition
misbehavior in the cost estimator. But I don't see anything like it
happening in current sources.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ryan | 2000-07-07 21:30:03 | "New" bug?? Serious - crashes backend. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-07 19:13:05 | Re: ps_status.h on FreeBSD 4.0 problems and fix |