From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | brian stone <skye0507(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql scalability, active-active cluster |
Date: | 2007-01-22 20:08:09 |
Message-ID: | 1169496489.20694.15.camel@dogma.v10.wvs |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 06:55 -0800, brian stone wrote:
> Are there any built in tools or 3rd party tools for distributing a
> postgresql database? I need an active active configuration; master-
> master with fail over. The project I am working needs to support a
> very large number of transactions a second. It will eventually require
> a main frame, or some absurd hardware. It makes much more sense to
> consider a clustered configuration. DB requests come in from a row of
> application servers. It would be nice if these requests could be
> distributed.
>
Consider pgpool, and look at the partitioning feature (which uses
different machines for different records, allowing writes to happen very
quickly).
Also, depending on what your needs are, a relational database might not
be right for you. You say you need transactions, but if you're comparing
to MySQL's master-master, I don't think that even supports ACID
transactions. Do you actually need transactions, or just many writes per
second (perhaps to memory rather than disk)?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-01-22 20:17:39 | Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Improvements |
Previous Message | Paul Lambert | 2007-01-22 20:01:45 | Re: Installing Postegres side-by-side with M$ SQL server]] |