| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
| Date: | 2007-01-07 11:46:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1168170389.3951.76.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 03:53 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 21:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Uh ... what in the world has an active portal got to do with it?
> >> I think you've confused snapshot considerations with crash recovery.
>
> > The patch sets HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED on all of the rows loaded by COPY as
> > well.
>
> I think you just talked yourself out of getting this patch applied.
Maybe; what would be your explanation? Do you have a failure case you
know of? Perhaps if one exists, there is another route.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-07 11:59:02 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-07 11:22:32 | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-07 11:59:02 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-01-07 11:22:32 | Re: [HACKERS] SGML index build fix |