From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-06 21:17:33 |
Message-ID: | 1168118253.3951.9.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 10:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
> > the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
> > hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
> > application/rejection.
> >
> > I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
> > good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
>
> You might remember months ago that people were complaining I was pushing
> things into CVS too quickly, so while the patches are in my mailbox,
> they are not in the queue until I feel the community has the time to
> focus on it.
I'm sorry if I explained that badly. All I meant to say was that the
patches aren't on the queue for review, so could they be placed at the
appropriate chronological point in the queue. (I was/am imagining the
queue to be ordered in time of arrival).
Patch review is, for me, harder than writing patches in the first place,
so with that in mind I don't expect it to happen quickly. You've
explained your on it now, so I'm patient.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-06 21:17:55 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-01-06 21:17:25 | Re: -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall |