From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
Date: | 2007-01-05 19:21:19 |
Message-ID: | 1168024879.3655.45.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg01172.php
As discussed on -hackers, its possible to avoid writing any WAL at all
for COPY in these circumstances:
BEGIN;
CREATE TABLE foo..
COPY foo...
COMMIT;
BEGIN;
TRUNCATE foo..
COPY foo...
COMMIT;
The enclosed patch implements this, as discussed. There is no user
interface to enable/disable, just as with CTAS and CREATE INDEX; no
docs, just code comments.
This plays nicely with the --single-transaction option in psql to allow
fast restores/upgrades.
YMMV but disk bound COPY will benefit greatly from this patch, some
tests showing 100% gain. COPY is still *very* CPU intensive, so some
tests have shown negligible benefit, fyi, but that isn't the typical
case.
Applies cleanly to CVS HEAD, passes make check.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
copy_nowal.v1.patch | text/x-patch | 24.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2007-01-05 19:28:07 | Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2007-01-05 19:18:47 | A patch to pg_regress for Windows port |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2007-01-05 19:28:07 | Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2007-01-05 19:18:47 | A patch to pg_regress for Windows port |