Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Date: 2024-04-05 03:10:50
Message-ID: 1167947.1712286650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> writes:
> It works with the latest libedit 20230828-3.1. Have to check the NetBSD
> source to find out what changed since 20181209-3.1.

Yeah, the test is passing on mamba which is running the (just
officially released) NetBSD 10.0. I'm not sure whether 10.0
has the "latest" libedit or something a little further back.
sidewinder, with NetBSD 9.3, is happy as well. But 20181209
presumably belongs to NetBSD 8.x, which is theoretically still
in support, so maybe it's worth poking into.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Wienhold 2024-04-05 03:34:15 Re: IPC::Run::time[r|out] vs our TAP tests
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-04-05 03:09:13 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation