| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| Date: | 2007-01-04 14:43:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1167921798.20749.111.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> > and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
> >
>
> AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were
> held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have
> been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The
> other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.
OK. Makes sense, thanks.
> > There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> > up on either list.
Hopefully the priority applies to all things that should be on the list.
> That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen
> would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-04 14:56:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-04 14:34:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files |