From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-04 10:32:33 |
Message-ID: | 1167906753.3903.648.camel@silverbirch.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
> > > that the holiday break is over:
> > >
> > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
> > >
> >
> > Some of these look obsolete. Also,
> >
> > . the plperl out params patch needs substantial rework by its author, IMHO.
> > . there is a new version of the enums patch that has been submitted.
>
> Yes, I will have to go through it, find the valuable ones, and get
> comments.
Sounds good.
I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?
There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
up on either list. I haven't made a list of these, but they include
major patches such as Grouped Item indexes and a number of others. Many
of those are clearly marked as ready to apply/review/reject.
Can I request that those be reviewed first? The unapplied patches list
looks long and many things on it aren't even patches, AFAICS -
presumably TODO items-in-waiting?
Some minor points:
[PATCHES] Incrementally Updated Backup, Simon Riggs
has already been applied to 8.2
[PATCHES] WAL logging freezing, Heikki Linnakangas
has already been agreed/applied to 8.2
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-01-04 12:25:38 | Re: Request for review: tsearch2 patch |
Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-01-04 09:00:32 | Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question |