| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Date: | 2006-12-31 15:58:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1167580703.22494.1.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It seems your interpretation of the OpenSSL "position" is as
> questionable as your interpretation of the GPL, and what the GPL can
> legally require. :-)
>
> Nobody has proven an issue exists. The only way to prove it would be
> for an actual court case to set the precident.
Further, OpenSSL is not saying that an issue exists for them. They are
saying that *some* people *may* have a problem with it.
Can we all talk about things that matter now? Like improving table
partitioning?
At a minimum, please move this thread to -advocacy.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> mark
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-12-31 16:09:01 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Previous Message | mark | 2006-12-31 15:42:42 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |